Griffon vs Hillman Solutions
GFF and HLMN side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GFF and HLMN compare
Griffon is the larger company, worth 3.1 times as much as Hillman Solutions ($4.8B against $1.6B).
On earnings, Griffon is cheaper: it trades at 27.1× trailing earnings, against 36.5× for Hillman Solutions.
Griffon grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (26.9% versus 6.5% for Hillman Solutions).
Griffon keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.5% compared with 2.6% at Hillman Solutions.
Griffon pays a dividend yielding 0.83%; Hillman Solutions does not pay one.
Griffon scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 10 for Hillman Solutions), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GFF | HLMN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.8B | $1.6B |
| Share price | $106.16 | $8.02 |
| Change, 1 year | 47.4% | −8.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 306% | −23.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.09 | 0.95 |
| Employees | 5,100 | 3,986 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 27.1× (better) | 36.5× |
| P/S | 1.7× | 1.0× (better) |
| P/B | 37.2× | 1.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.1× | 8.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | 16.2× (better) | 25.5× |
| FCF yield | 6.2% (better) | 3.9% |
| Fair value | $89.74 | $10.72 |
| Margin of safety | −18.3% | 25.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 26.9% (better) | 6.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.0% (better) | 2.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 156% (better) | 89.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 193% (better) | 100% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −1.7% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 40.5% | 48.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | 16.7% (better) | 6.9% |
| Net margin | 6.5% (better) | 2.6% |
| FCF margin | 10.8% (better) | 3.8% |
| Return on equity | 185% (better) | 3.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 20.4% (better) | 4.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 9.81 | 0.57 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.35 (better) | 2.56 |
| Interest coverage | 5.2× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.41 | 2.71 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.29 (better) | 1.76 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.83% | – |
| Payout ratio | 21.8% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 13 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 19.1% | – |
| Buyback yield | 2.9% (better) | 2.3% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.8% (better) | 2.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 80.6% | 101% |
| Held by insiders | 6.9% | 1.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$37.4M | −$110K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.4% | 2.8% |
Go deeper
- GFF stock overview
- GFF income statement
- GFF valuation and score
- HLMN stock overview
- HLMN income statement
- HLMN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.