GE Vernova vs Qualcomm
GEV and QCOM side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GEV and QCOM compare
GE Vernova is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Qualcomm ($217B against $186B).
On earnings, Qualcomm is cheaper: it trades at 13.9× trailing earnings, against 21.5× for GE Vernova.
GE Vernova grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.9% versus −2.6% for Qualcomm).
Qualcomm keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 31.6% compared with 23.5% at GE Vernova.
Both pay dividends: GE Vernova yields 0.18% and Qualcomm 2.0%.
Qualcomm scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 12 for GE Vernova), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GEV | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $217B | $186B |
| Share price | $818.49 | $177.14 |
| Change, 1 year | 42.1% | 1.8% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −4.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.39 | 1.53 |
| Employees | 75K | 57K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 3 | 3 |
| Health score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 21.5× | 13.9× (better) |
| P/S | 4.9× | 4.3× (better) |
| P/B | 19.0× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 72.1× | 18.8× (better) |
| P/FCF | 12.7× (better) | 21.5× |
| PEG | – | 0.55 |
| FCF yield | 7.9% (better) | 4.7% |
| Fair value | – | $192.39 |
| Margin of safety | – | 7.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 16.9% (better) | −2.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 5.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 508% (better) | 146% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 522% (better) | 153% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 10.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 21.7% | 53.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 6.4% | 20.1% (better) |
| Net margin | 23.5% | 31.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 38.9% (better) | 20.1% |
| Return on equity | 104% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.25 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −4.93 | 0.72 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 12.6× |
| Current ratio | 0.83 | 1.86 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.44 | 5.68 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.18% | 2.0% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 4.6% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | 17 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 6.4% |
| Buyback yield | 2.9% | 4.1% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 3.1% | 6.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 80.3% | 80.2% |
| Held by insiders | 0.10% | 0.08% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$11.5M (better) | −$21.4M |
| Superinvestors holding | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.8% | 2.8% |
Go deeper
- GEV stock overview
- GEV income statement
- GEV valuation and score
- QCOM stock overview
- QCOM income statement
- QCOM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.