GEN Restaurant vs MasterBeef
GENK and MB side by side, both in eating and drinking places. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GENK and MB compare
GEN Restaurant grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−2.9% versus −8.9% for MasterBeef).
GEN Restaurant scores higher on the StockData Score (3 against 1 for MasterBeef), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GENK | MB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.9M | – |
| Share price | $1.49 | $3.94 |
| Change, 1 year | −51.8% | −53.9% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −73.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.12 | −0.85 |
| Employees | 2,700 | 336 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.0× | – |
| FCF yield | −247% | – |
| Fair value | $18.05 | – |
| Margin of safety | 91.7% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −2.9% (better) | −8.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −224% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | −13.5% | – |
| Net margin | −2.1% | – |
| FCF margin | −9.3% | −3.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Current ratio | 0.29 | 1.55 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.27 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 1.8% | – |
| Held by insiders | 58.9% | 72.7% |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.1% | – |
Go deeper
- GENK stock overview
- GENK income statement
- GENK valuation and score
- MB stock overview
- MB income statement
- MB valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.