StockData

Golden Heaven vs Xponential Fitness

GDHG and XPOF side by side, both in miscellaneous amusement and recreation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How GDHG and XPOF compare

Xponential Fitness grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.2% versus −31.5% for Golden Heaven).

Golden Heaven keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −56.2% compared with −300% at Xponential Fitness.

Golden Heaven scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 3 for Xponential Fitness), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricGDHGXPOF
Size and price
Market cap–$228M
Share price$0.910$4.63
Change, 1 year−78.7%−26.2%
Change, 5 years–−79.5%
Beta (5Y)1.141.40
Employees86340
StockData Score
Total score6 (better)3
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score02 (better)
Health score5 (better)0
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–20.4×
EV/EBITDA–15.7×
FCF yield–−5.3%
Fair value–$3.35
Margin of safety–−38.3%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−31.5%3.2% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average–55.7%
Profitability
Gross margin50.2%–
Operating margin−44.5%303% (better)
Net margin−56.2% (better)−300%
FCF margin–−109%
Return on equity−5.7%–
Return on invested capital−11.0%21.6% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Net debt / EBITDA–11.46
Interest coverage–0.6×
Current ratio3.05 (better)0.69
Altman Z-score–−2.89
Piotroski F-score55
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions–69.6%
Held by insiders–68.5%
Insider net buying, 12 months–$964K
Short interest, % of float–72.6%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.