GoDaddy vs Parsons
GDDY and PSN side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GDDY and PSN compare
GoDaddy is the larger company, worth 2.7 times as much as Parsons ($14.8B against $5.4B).
On earnings, GoDaddy is cheaper: it trades at 17.4× trailing earnings, against 35.0× for Parsons.
GoDaddy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.4% versus −5.8% for Parsons).
GoDaddy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 17.8% compared with 2.5% at Parsons.
Parsons scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 9 for GoDaddy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GDDY | PSN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $14.8B | $5.4B |
| Share price | $117.24 | $50.69 |
| Change, 1 year | −7.4% | −38.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 61.1% | 37.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.04 | 0.76 |
| Employees | 5,845 | 400 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 17.4× (better) | 35.0× |
| P/S | 2.9× | 0.9× (better) |
| P/B | 2216× | 2.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.8× (better) | 15.2× |
| P/FCF | 8.7× (better) | 17.6× |
| PEG | – | 0.96 |
| FCF yield | 11.5% (better) | 5.7% |
| Fair value | $162.03 | $49.47 |
| Margin of safety | 27.6% (better) | −2.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.4% (better) | −5.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.3% | 10.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 12.6% (better) | −36.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 20.4% (better) | −35.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 17.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 63.8% (better) | 22.0% |
| Operating margin | 24.8% (better) | 4.9% |
| Net margin | 17.8% (better) | 2.5% |
| FCF margin | 33.4% (better) | 4.9% |
| Return on equity | 443% (better) | 6.1% |
| Return on invested capital | 34.7% (better) | 6.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 563.34 | 0.56 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.93 (better) | 2.73 |
| Interest coverage | 8.4× (better) | 5.3× |
| Current ratio | 0.63 | 1.66 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.55 | 2.54 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 11.0% (better) | 2.3% |
| Shareholder yield | 11.0% (better) | 2.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 105% | 103% |
| Held by insiders | 0.91% | 1.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$12.9M | $3.1M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.2% | 5.3% |
Go deeper
- GDDY stock overview
- GDDY income statement
- GDDY valuation and score
- PSN stock overview
- PSN income statement
- PSN valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.