GigaCloud Technology vs Revolve
GCT and RVLV side by side, both in nonstore retailers. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GCT and RVLV compare
GigaCloud Technology is the larger company, worth 3.5 times as much as Revolve ($4.8B against $1.3B).
On earnings, GigaCloud Technology is cheaper: it trades at 14.3× trailing earnings, against 18.7× for Revolve.
GigaCloud Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (27.4% versus 10.8% for Revolve).
GigaCloud Technology keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.9% compared with 5.5% at Revolve.
GigaCloud Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 17 for Revolve), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GCT | RVLV |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.8B | $1.3B |
| Share price | $66.63 | $18.86 |
| Change, 1 year | 107% | −13.6% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −78.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.11 | 1.85 |
| Employees | 1,644 | 1,664 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 17 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 14.3× (better) | 18.7× |
| P/S | 3.1× | 1.0× (better) |
| P/B | 8.4× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 21.9× | 12.2× (better) |
| P/FCF | 34.9× (better) | 48.5× |
| PEG | 0.18 (better) | 6.51 |
| FCF yield | 2.9% (better) | 2.1% |
| Fair value | $62.79 | $26.43 |
| Margin of safety | −6.1% | 28.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 27.4% (better) | 10.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 36.2% (better) | 16.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 30.6% | 60.4% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 39.6% | 62.9% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 21.4% (better) | 1.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 24.4% | 54.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | 12.2% (better) | 6.1% |
| Net margin | 10.9% (better) | 5.5% |
| FCF margin | 8.8% (better) | 2.1% |
| Return on equity | 33.1% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 132% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | 446× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.17 | 2.48 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 6.59 (better) | 5.76 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 1.5% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.5% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 33.5% | 63.1% |
| Held by insiders | 36.4% | 42.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$47.4M (better) | −$77.0M |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.0% | 9.9% |
Go deeper
- GCT stock overview
- GCT income statement
- GCT valuation and score
- RVLV stock overview
- RVLV income statement
- RVLV valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.