GCM Grosvenor vs Ridgepost Capital
GCMG and RPC side by side, both in services allied with the exchange of securities. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GCMG and RPC compare
GCM Grosvenor is the larger company, worth 2.6 times as much as Ridgepost Capital ($2.7B against $1.1B).
Ridgepost Capital grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.2% versus 6.6% for GCM Grosvenor).
Ridgepost Capital keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.8% compared with 8.0% at GCM Grosvenor.
Both pay dividends: GCM Grosvenor yields 3.6% and Ridgepost Capital 1.6%.
GCM Grosvenor scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 10 for Ridgepost Capital), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GCMG | RPC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.7B | $1.1B |
| Share price | $13.50 | $9.53 |
| Change, 1 year | 17.0% | −6.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 14.8% | −31.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.88 | 0.99 |
| Employees | 553 | 326 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 29.8× |
| P/S | 4.7× | 3.2× (better) |
| P/B | 82.7× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.7× | 13.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | 13.7× | 10.9× (better) |
| FCF yield | 7.3% | 9.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $10.68 | $12.05 |
| Margin of safety | −26.4% | 20.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.6% | 8.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.3% | 34.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 36.0% | 129% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 129% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −13.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 27.1% | 27.2% (better) |
| Net margin | 8.0% | 10.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | 34.4% (better) | 29.6% |
| Return on equity | 360% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 3.1× |
| Altman Z-score | 4.34 (better) | 1.34 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.6% (better) | 1.6% |
| Payout ratio | – | 48.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Buyback yield | 1.8% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 5.4% (better) | 1.6% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 27.2% | 44.2% |
| Held by insiders | – | 25.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$10.2M | $1.1M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 5.1% |
Go deeper
- GCMG stock overview
- GCMG income statement
- GCMG valuation and score
- RPC stock overview
- RPC income statement
- RPC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.