StockData

GCL Global vs Snail

GCL and SNAL side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How GCL and SNAL compare

GCL Global grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (68.2% versus 27.7% for Snail).

Snail keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.7% compared with −10.5% at GCL Global.

Snail scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 3 for GCL Global), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricGCLSNAL
Size and price
Market cap–$24.4M
Share price$1.20$2.73
Change, 1 year−28.4%−47.0%
Beta (5Y)0.042.46
Employees147166
StockData Score
Total score36 (better)
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score22
Performance score02 (better)
Health score11
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–0.2×
EV/EBITDA–2.2×
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)68.2% (better)27.7%
Net income growth (TTM)−547%–
EPS growth (TTM)−500%–
Profitability
Gross margin10.3%44.3% (better)
Operating margin−5.6%4.8% (better)
Net margin−10.5%4.7% (better)
FCF margin−4.9%–
Return on equity−68.8%–
Return on invested capital−18.1%–
Financial health
Debt / equity2.06–
Net debt / EBITDA–−1.44
Interest coverage–6.6×
Current ratio1.52 (better)0.58
Altman Z-score–1.25
Piotroski F-score22
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by insiders65.7%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.