Greene County Bancorp vs Southern Missouri Bancorp
GCBC and SMBC side by side, both in savings institutions. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GCBC and SMBC compare
Southern Missouri Bancorp is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as Greene County Bancorp ($779M against $609M).
On earnings, Southern Missouri Bancorp is cheaper: it trades at 11.0× trailing earnings, against 14.8× for Greene County Bancorp.
Greene County Bancorp grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (22.9% versus 9.9% for Southern Missouri Bancorp).
Greene County Bancorp keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 44.3% compared with 35.8% at Southern Missouri Bancorp.
Both pay dividends: Greene County Bancorp yields 1.1% and Southern Missouri Bancorp 1.4%.
Southern Missouri Bancorp scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 16 for Greene County Bancorp), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GCBC | SMBC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $609M | $779M |
| Share price | $35.76 | $70.70 |
| Change, 1 year | 64.0% | 33.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 102% | 18.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.48 | 0.68 |
| Employees | 203 | 711 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 | 18 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Health score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 14.8× | 11.0× (better) |
| P/S | 6.6× | 3.9× (better) |
| P/B | 2.2× | 1.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | 14.7× | 10.2× (better) |
| PEG | 1.48 | 0.59 (better) |
| FCF yield | 6.8% | 9.8% (better) |
| Fair value | $31.14 | $70.95 |
| Margin of safety | −14.8% | 0.35% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 22.9% (better) | 9.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.1% | 12.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 31.7% (better) | 22.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 31.7% (better) | 24.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 11.4% (better) | 4.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 44.3% (better) | 35.8% |
| FCF margin | 44.9% (better) | 38.2% |
| Return on equity | 15.9% (better) | 12.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Altman Z-score | 0.28 (better) | 0.14 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.1% | 1.4% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 9.9% | 15.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | 12 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 10.8% (better) | 10.0% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.1% | 1.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 14.9% | 59.0% |
| Held by insiders | 2.9% | 14.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $215K (better) | −$1.8M |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.62% | 4.7% |
Go deeper
- GCBC stock overview
- GCBC income statement
- GCBC valuation and score
- SMBC stock overview
- SMBC income statement
- SMBC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.