StockData

Global Indemnity vs Kestrel

GBLI and KG side by side, both in fire, marine, and casualty insurance. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How GBLI and KG compare

Global Indemnity is the larger company, worth 13 times as much as Kestrel ($339M against $26.3M).

Kestrel grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (26.2% versus 3.0% for Global Indemnity).

Global Indemnity keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.7% compared with −156% at Kestrel.

Global Indemnity pays a dividend yielding 6.4%; Kestrel does not pay one.

Global Indemnity scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 3 for Kestrel), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricGBLIKG
Size and price
Market cap$339M$26.3M
Share price$22.00$3.36
Change, 1 year−23.0%−80.0%
Change, 5 years−16.2%−94.6%
Beta (5Y)0.181.13
Employees28644
StockData Score
Total score13 (better)3
Valuation score6 (better)2
Growth score01 (better)
Performance score2 (better)0
Health score00
Dividend score5 (better)0
Valuation
P/E10.5×–
P/S0.7× (better)0.8×
P/B0.5×0.3× (better)
EV/EBITDA3.5×–
Fair value$38.03–
Margin of safety42.1%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)3.0%26.2% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average−5.1%–
Net income growth (TTM)9.9% (better)−177%
EPS growth (TTM)9.4%–
Profitability
Net margin6.7% (better)−156%
Return on equity4.4% (better)−41.1%
Financial health
Altman Z-score0.71 (better)0.01
Piotroski F-score44
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield6.4%–
Payout ratio81.9%–
Years of dividend growth0–
Dividend growth, 5Y average7.0%–
Shareholder yield6.4% (better)0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions18.6%13.2%
Held by insiders27.6%56.3%
Insider net buying, 12 months$0$13.3K (better)
Short interest, % of float0.06%1.2%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.