Galiano Gold vs United States Lime & Minerals
GAU and USLM side by side, both in mining & quarrying of nonmetallic minerals (no fuels). Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GAU and USLM compare
Galiano Gold grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (93.6% versus 4.5% for United States Lime & Minerals).
United States Lime & Minerals keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 35.1% compared with −6.5% at Galiano Gold.
United States Lime & Minerals pays a dividend yielding 0.22%; Galiano Gold does not pay one.
United States Lime & Minerals scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 2 for Galiano Gold), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GAU | USLM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $3.2B |
| Share price | $2.28 | $111.18 |
| Change, 1 year | −2.6% | −9.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 185% | 314% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.88 | 0.90 |
| Employees | 23 | 346 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 24.0× |
| P/S | – | 8.4× |
| P/B | – | 4.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 15.0× |
| P/FCF | – | 32.3× |
| PEG | – | 0.56 |
| FCF yield | – | 3.1% |
| Fair value | – | $88.00 |
| Margin of safety | – | −26.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 93.6% (better) | 4.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 18.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −579% | 2.3% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −650% | 2.0% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 36.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 14.7% | 47.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | 8.2% | 41.2% (better) |
| Net margin | −6.5% | 35.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 9.6% | 25.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | −12.7% | 20.0% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 14.7% | 44.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 2.1× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.92 | 22.29 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 32.83 |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.22% |
| Payout ratio | – | 5.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 2 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 13.4% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.08% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 0.30% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 55.4% | 32.6% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 62.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$5.1M |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.6% | 9.7% |
Go deeper
- GAU stock overview
- GAU income statement
- GAU valuation and score
- USLM stock overview
- USLM income statement
- USLM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.