StockData

StealthGas vs Imperial Petroleum Inc./Marshall Islands

GASS and IMPP side by side, both in water transportation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How GASS and IMPP compare

Imperial Petroleum Inc./Marshall Islands grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.2% versus 3.5% for StealthGas).

StealthGas keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 35.0% compared with 31.0% at Imperial Petroleum Inc./Marshall Islands.

StealthGas scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 7 for Imperial Petroleum Inc./Marshall Islands), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricGASSIMPP
Size and price
Share price$7.90$4.47
Change, 1 year16.5%−24.5%
Change, 5 years193%–
Beta (5Y)0.250.79
StockData Score
Total score9 (better)7
Valuation score00
Growth score12 (better)
Performance score33
Health score5 (better)2
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)3.5%9.2% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average3.6%51.3% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)−13.2%−0.36% (better)
EPS growth (TTM)−13.7%−7.9% (better)
EPS growth, 5Y average39.5%–
Profitability
Operating margin31.8% (better)24.8%
Net margin35.0% (better)31.0%
FCF margin49.0%–
Return on equity9.2%9.7% (better)
Return on invested capital7.1% (better)7.0%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Net debt / EBITDA−1.80–
Interest coverage34.8× (better)17.3×
Current ratio9.30 (better)4.77
Piotroski F-score55
Ownership
Held by institutions37.8%–
Held by insiders41.3%32.0%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$347K–
Short interest, % of float0.28%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.