Genpact vs ICF International
G and ICFI side by side, both in management and public relations services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How G and ICFI compare
Genpact is the larger company, worth 3.9 times as much as ICF International ($6.7B against $1.7B).
On earnings, Genpact is cheaper: it trades at 11.8× trailing earnings, against 19.8× for ICF International.
Genpact grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.5% versus −7.9% for ICF International).
Genpact keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.1% compared with 4.9% at ICF International.
Both pay dividends: Genpact yields 1.4% and ICF International 0.59%.
Genpact scores higher on the StockData Score (21 against 20 for ICF International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | G | ICFI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.7B | $1.7B |
| Share price | $39.62 | $95.48 |
| Change, 1 year | 4.6% | 11.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −21.6% | −9.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.66 | 0.65 |
| Employees | 147K | 8,400 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 21 (better) | 20 |
| Valuation score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 11.8× (better) | 19.8× |
| P/S | 1.3× | 0.9× (better) |
| P/B | 2.6× | 1.6× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.4× (better) | 10.7× |
| P/FCF | 11.6× | 8.6× (better) |
| PEG | 0.63 (better) | 1.46 |
| FCF yield | 8.6% | 11.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $56.35 | $126.21 |
| Margin of safety | 29.7% (better) | 24.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.5% (better) | −7.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.5% (better) | 4.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 8.2% (better) | −17.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 12.0% (better) | −16.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 14.8% (better) | 11.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 36.5% | 37.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | 14.8% (better) | 7.8% |
| Net margin | 11.1% (better) | 4.9% |
| FCF margin | 10.9% | 10.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | 22.4% (better) | 8.6% |
| Return on invested capital | 18.3% (better) | 7.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.45 | 0.39 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.85 (better) | 2.05 |
| Interest coverage | – | 4.9× |
| Current ratio | 2.00 (better) | 1.39 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.50 (better) | 2.83 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.4% (better) | 0.59% |
| Payout ratio | 20.9% | 11.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 11.8% (better) | 0.00% |
| Buyback yield | – | 2.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.4% | 3.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 107% | 102% |
| Held by insiders | 35.7% | 1.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$8.1M | −$1.1M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 10.2% | 4.4% |
Go deeper
- G stock overview
- G income statement
- G valuation and score
- ICFI stock overview
- ICFI income statement
- ICFI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.