StockData

UTime vs Ultralife

FXHO and ULBI side by side, both in electronic and other electrical equipment and components, except computer equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How FXHO and ULBI compare

Ultralife grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.0% versus −21.8% for UTime).

Ultralife keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −1.5% compared with −14.2% at UTime.

Ultralife scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 3 for UTime), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricFXHOULBI
Size and price
Market cap–$262M
Share price$5.75$15.73
Change, 1 year−96.2%173%
Change, 5 years−100.0%171%
Beta (5Y)1.550.85
Employees34678
StockData Score
Total score37 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score03 (better)
Performance score12 (better)
Health score22
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–1.4×
P/B–1.9×
FCF yield–−0.26%
Fair value–$7.69
Margin of safety–−105%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−21.8%3.0% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average−4.5%12.2% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)–−272%
Profitability
Gross margin1.0%25.7% (better)
Operating margin−11.1%−2.2% (better)
Net margin−14.2%−1.5% (better)
FCF margin−74.5%−0.36% (better)
Return on equity−535%−2.2% (better)
Return on invested capital–−1.9%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.480.38 (better)
Interest coverage−3.7×–
Current ratio1.412.97 (better)
Altman Z-score–2.74
Piotroski F-score44
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions–32.1%
Held by insiders59.1%41.4%
Insider net buying, 12 months–$2.2M
Short interest, % of float–0.66%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.