UTime vs Intchains
FXHO and ICG side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FXHO and ICG compare
Intchains grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−21.6% versus −21.8% for UTime).
UTime keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −14.2% compared with −21.5% at Intchains.
Intchains scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 3 for UTime), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FXHO | ICG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $5.75 | $1.44 |
| Change, 1 year | −96.2% | 33.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −100.0% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.55 | 1.02 |
| Employees | 34 | 88 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −21.8% | −21.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −4.5% | 32.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −192% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −191% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 1.0% | 7.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | −11.1% (better) | −47.4% |
| Net margin | −14.2% (better) | −21.5% |
| FCF margin | −74.5% | −44.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | −535% | −5.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | −19.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.48 (better) | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −3.7× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.41 | 16.22 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 0.09% |
| Held by insiders | 59.1% | 47.9% |
Go deeper
- FXHO stock overview
- FXHO income statement
- FXHO valuation and score
- ICG stock overview
- ICG income statement
- ICG valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.