Invesco CurrencyShares Australian Dollar Trust vs Invesco CurrencyShares British Pound Sterling Trust
FXA and FXB side by side, both in commodity contracts brokers and dealers. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FXA and FXB compare
Invesco CurrencyShares Australian Dollar Trust is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as Invesco CurrencyShares British Pound Sterling Trust ($98.3M against $76.6M).
On earnings, Invesco CurrencyShares British Pound Sterling Trust is cheaper: it trades at 46.6× trailing earnings, against 77.9× for Invesco CurrencyShares Australian Dollar Trust.
Invesco CurrencyShares Australian Dollar Trust grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (28.5% versus −7.8% for Invesco CurrencyShares British Pound Sterling Trust).
Invesco CurrencyShares British Pound Sterling Trust keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 84.0% compared with 76.3% at Invesco CurrencyShares Australian Dollar Trust.
Both pay dividends: Invesco CurrencyShares Australian Dollar Trust yields 1.1% and Invesco CurrencyShares British Pound Sterling Trust 1.9%.
Invesco CurrencyShares Australian Dollar Trust scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 10 for Invesco CurrencyShares British Pound Sterling Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FXA | FXB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $98.3M | $76.6M |
| Share price | $67.81 | $127.59 |
| Change, 1 year | 4.8% | 0.69% |
| Change, 5 years | −5.6% | −1.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.34 | 0.21 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 2 | 2 |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 1 | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 77.9× | 46.6× (better) |
| P/S | 62.0× | 39.0× (better) |
| PEG | – | 0.43 |
| Fair value | $23.65 | $57.74 |
| Margin of safety | −187% | −121% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 28.5% (better) | −7.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 69.6% | 83.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 28.3% (better) | −10.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 3.6% (better) | −16.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 76.3% | 84.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Altman Z-score | 1929.01 (better) | 1880.49 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.1% | 1.9% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 95.4% | 101% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 107% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.1% | 1.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 29.1% | 43.8% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.0% | 62.4% |
Go deeper
- FXA stock overview
- FXA income statement
- FXA valuation and score
- FXB stock overview
- FXB income statement
- FXB valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.