First Watch Restaurant vs Jack in the Box
FWRG and JACK side by side, both in eating and drinking places. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FWRG and JACK compare
Jack in the Box is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as First Watch Restaurant ($1.2B against $837M).
On earnings, Jack in the Box is cheaper: it trades at 8.3× trailing earnings, against 46.8× for First Watch Restaurant.
First Watch Restaurant grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (19.3% versus 14.3% for Jack in the Box).
Jack in the Box keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.4% compared with 1.4% at First Watch Restaurant.
First Watch Restaurant scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 6 for Jack in the Box), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FWRG | JACK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $837M | $1.2B |
| Share price | $13.56 | $14.51 |
| Change, 1 year | −23.3% | −7.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −35.9% | −85.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.11 | 1.09 |
| Employees | 30 | 5,046 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 4 | 4 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 46.8× | 8.3× (better) |
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 0.8× |
| P/B | 1.3× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.9× (better) | 190× |
| P/FCF | – | 42.1× |
| PEG | 1.13 | – |
| FCF yield | −2.5% | 2.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $16.15 | $37.79 |
| Margin of safety | 16.0% | 61.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 19.3% (better) | 14.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 29.0% (better) | 7.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 336% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 383% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 2.1% (better) | −3.5% |
| Net margin | 1.4% | 2.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | −1.6% | 2.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 2.9% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 3.2% (better) | −6.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.46 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.43 (better) | 102.70 |
| Interest coverage | 1.5× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.27 | 0.58 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.09 | 2.15 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.00% |
| Payout ratio | – | 0.00% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | −6.0% |
| Buyback yield | – | −0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% (better) | −0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 106% | 24.2% |
| Held by insiders | – | 7.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.6M | −$751K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 7.8% |
Go deeper
- FWRG stock overview
- FWRG income statement
- FWRG valuation and score
- JACK stock overview
- JACK income statement
- JACK valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.