Forward Air vs Hub
FWRD and HUBG side by side, both in transportation services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FWRD and HUBG compare
Forward Air is the larger company, worth 395 times as much as Hub ($587M against $1.5M).
Forward Air grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2.5% versus −5.8% for Hub).
Hub keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.8% compared with −10.1% at Forward Air.
Hub pays a dividend yielding 2.0%; Forward Air does not pay one.
Hub scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 3 for Forward Air), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FWRD | HUBG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $587M | $1.5M |
| Share price | $17.39 | $24.60 |
| Change, 1 year | −22.3% | −31.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −83.1% | −41.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.35 | 0.99 |
| Employees | 6,062 | 6,500 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.2× | 0.0× (better) |
| P/B | – | 0.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 137× | 0.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | 18.4× | 0.0× (better) |
| FCF yield | 5.4% | 7632% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $30944.90 |
| Margin of safety | – | 99.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.5% (better) | −5.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 14.5% (better) | 1.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −3.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 1.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | −5.5% | 3.8% (better) |
| Net margin | −10.1% | 2.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | 1.2% | 3.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | −1291% | 6.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −7.1% | 6.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.15 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 99.43 | 0.45 (better) |
| Interest coverage | −0.8× | 11.2× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.41 | 1.47 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.70 | 2.56 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.0% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 28.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 929% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 932% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 90.2% | 103% |
| Held by insiders | 14.4% | 4.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $0 (better) | −$1.2M |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.3% | 6.6% |
Go deeper
- FWRD stock overview
- FWRD income statement
- FWRD valuation and score
- HUBG stock overview
- HUBG income statement
- HUBG valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.