StockData

Fiverr International vs Xometry

FVRR and XMTR side by side, both in miscellaneous business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How FVRR and XMTR compare

Xometry grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (33.7% versus 10.1% for Fiverr International).

Xometry scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 4 for Fiverr International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricFVRRXMTR
Size and price
Market cap–$6.9B
Share price$8.05$119.61
Change, 1 year−63.3%82.2%
Change, 5 years−95.0%120%
Beta (5Y)1.751.79
Employees5281,174
StockData Score
Total score45 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score13 (better)
Performance score2 (better)0
Health score12 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–8.5×
P/B–11.5×
Fair value–$24.08
Margin of safety–−397%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)10.1%33.7% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average17.9%37.2% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)15.0%–
EPS growth (TTM)16.7%–
Profitability
Gross margin81.6% (better)38.7%
Operating margin−0.27% (better)−3.8%
Net margin4.9%–
FCF margin24.1%–
Return on equity5.4%–
Return on invested capital−1.9% (better)−39.3%
Financial health
Interest coverage−0.6× (better)−6.1×
Current ratio1.933.21 (better)
Altman Z-score–9.52
Piotroski F-score8–
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions45.6%98.2%
Held by insiders17.1%8.8%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$1.5M (better)−$19.7M
Superinvestors holding–1
Short interest, % of float8.8%7.1%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.