FrontView REIT vs Universal Health Realty Income Trust
FVR and UHT side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FVR and UHT compare
Universal Health Realty Income Trust is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as FrontView REIT ($542M against $469M).
FrontView REIT grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.4% versus −0.02% for Universal Health Realty Income Trust).
Universal Health Realty Income Trust keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 20.3% compared with −0.04% at FrontView REIT.
Both pay dividends: FrontView REIT yields 4.5% and Universal Health Realty Income Trust 7.7%.
Universal Health Realty Income Trust scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 6 for FrontView REIT), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FVR | UHT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $469M | $542M |
| Share price | $19.16 | $39.03 |
| Change, 1 year | 45.0% | −0.05% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −32.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.69 | 0.56 |
| Employees | 22 | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 26.9× |
| P/S | 6.6× | 5.5× (better) |
| P/B | 0.9× (better) | 3.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 8.4× |
| Fair value | $16.74 | $40.34 |
| Margin of safety | −14.4% | 3.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.4% (better) | −0.02% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 4.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 12.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 12.4% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −2.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 35.9% |
| Net margin | −0.04% | 20.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | −0.01% | 13.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 19.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.81 | 3.28 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.5% | 7.7% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 206% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 15 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 1.4% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.5% | 7.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 88.1% | 62.0% |
| Held by insiders | 9.7% | 2.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $0 |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.5% | 2.1% |
Go deeper
- FVR stock overview
- FVR income statement
- FVR valuation and score
- UHT stock overview
- UHT income statement
- UHT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.