FrontView REIT vs Alpine Income Property Trust
FVR and PINE side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FVR and PINE compare
FrontView REIT is the larger company, worth 1.6 times as much as Alpine Income Property Trust ($453M against $289M).
On earnings, Alpine Income Property Trust is cheaper: it trades at 86.3× trailing earnings, against 265× for FrontView REIT.
Alpine Income Property Trust grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (24.0% versus 9.4% for FrontView REIT).
Alpine Income Property Trust keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.4% compared with 2.1% at FrontView REIT.
Both pay dividends: FrontView REIT yields 4.6% and Alpine Income Property Trust 7.4%.
Alpine Income Property Trust scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 6 for FrontView REIT), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FVR | PINE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $453M | $289M |
| Share price | $18.54 | $16.39 |
| Change, 1 year | 37.3% | 13.0% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −12.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.74 | 0.44 |
| Employees | 22 | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 265× | 86.3× (better) |
| P/S | 6.5× | 4.1× (better) |
| P/B | 1.0× | 0.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 6.0× |
| Fair value | $16.94 | $17.14 |
| Margin of safety | −9.4% | 4.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.4% | 24.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 25.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 33.9% |
| Net margin | 2.1% | 9.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 0.36% | 2.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 5.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | – | 1.4× |
| Altman Z-score | 0.75 (better) | 0.53 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.6% | 7.4% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 1272% | 303% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 6 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 6.8% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.6% | 7.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 88.1% | 60.4% |
| Held by insiders | 9.6% | 7.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$261K |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.1% | 2.3% |
Go deeper
- FVR stock overview
- FVR income statement
- FVR valuation and score
- PINE stock overview
- PINE income statement
- PINE valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.