Fusemachines vs Algorhythm
FUSE and RIME side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FUSE and RIME compare
Fusemachines is the larger company, worth 6.8 times as much as Algorhythm ($10.1M against $1.5M).
Algorhythm scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 1 for Fusemachines), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FUSE | RIME |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $10.1M | $1.5M |
| Share price | $0.348 | $0.088 |
| Change, 1 year | −82.2% | −95.7% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −100.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.22 | −0.90 |
| Employees | 270 | 49 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 1.4× | 0.2× (better) |
| FCF yield | −98.2% (better) | −724% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | −37.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 52.4% (better) | −26.3% |
| Operating margin | −144% (better) | −149% |
| Net margin | – | −176% |
| FCF margin | −133% | −127% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Current ratio | 0.29 | 0.90 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −19.47 | −7.41 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 23.8% | 7.9% |
| Held by insiders | 66.0% | 56.7% |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 23.1% |
Go deeper
- FUSE stock overview
- FUSE income statement
- FUSE valuation and score
- RIME stock overview
- RIME income statement
- RIME valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.