Six Flags Entertainment vs Warner Music
FUN and WMG side by side, both in amusement and recreation services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FUN and WMG compare
Warner Music is the larger company, worth 21 times as much as Six Flags Entertainment ($16.0B against $765M).
Warner Music grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.9% versus −3.5% for Six Flags Entertainment).
Warner Music keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.2% compared with −57.3% at Six Flags Entertainment.
Warner Music pays a dividend yielding 2.5%; Six Flags Entertainment does not pay one.
Warner Music scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 1 for Six Flags Entertainment), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FUN | WMG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $765M | $16.0B |
| Share price | $7.48 | $30.62 |
| Change, 1 year | −68.5% | −2.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −84.9% | −36.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.10 | 1.05 |
| Employees | 4,225 | 5,500 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 1 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.3× (better) | 2.2× |
| P/B | 6.7× (better) | 18.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 10.9× |
| P/FCF | 5.1× (better) | 19.2× |
| FCF yield | 19.6% (better) | 5.2% |
| Fair value | $2.43 | $27.89 |
| Margin of safety | −208% | −9.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −3.5% | 12.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 76.4% (better) | 8.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 126% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 91.4% (better) | 45.8% |
| Operating margin | −44.2% | 13.7% (better) |
| Net margin | −57.3% | 9.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 4.9% | 11.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | −185% | 93.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −17.9% | 35.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 43.47 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 5.5× |
| Current ratio | 0.42 | 0.73 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −0.67 | 1.71 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.5% |
| Payout ratio | – | 59.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 4 |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.38% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 2.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 104% | 30.5% |
| Held by insiders | 8.0% | 72.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $6.4M (better) | $3.0M |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 24.5% | 7.0% |
Go deeper
- FUN stock overview
- FUN income statement
- FUN valuation and score
- WMG stock overview
- WMG income statement
- WMG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.