FuboTV vs Netflix
FUBO and NFLX side by side, both in communication services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FUBO and NFLX compare
Netflix is the larger company, worth 311 times as much as FuboTV ($258B against $832M).
FuboTV grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (52.0% versus 16.0% for Netflix).
Netflix keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 28.2% compared with −1.4% at FuboTV.
Netflix scores higher on the StockData Score (21 against 6 for FuboTV), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FUBO | NFLX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $832M | $258B |
| Share price | $7.62 | $62.08 |
| Change, 1 year | −82.8% | −43.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −98.1% | −3.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.48 | 1.41 |
| Employees | 590 | 16K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 21 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 19.5× |
| P/S | 0.2× (better) | 5.3× |
| P/B | – | 8.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 17.9× |
| P/FCF | – | 23.2× |
| PEG | – | 0.54 |
| FCF yield | – | 4.3% |
| Fair value | – | $86.31 |
| Margin of safety | – | 28.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 52.0% (better) | 16.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 12.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 33.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 35.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 33.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 49.1% |
| Operating margin | −1.9% | 29.7% (better) |
| Net margin | −1.4% | 28.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | 23.1% |
| Return on equity | – | 49.5% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 35.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.47 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.35 |
| Interest coverage | −9.7× | 16.9× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.00 | 1.14 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.47 | 8.37 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 3.8% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 3.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 13.9% | 81.7% |
| Held by insiders | – | 0.55% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$3.3M (better) | −$357M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 10 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 2.0% |
Go deeper
- FUBO stock overview
- FUBO income statement
- FUBO valuation and score
- NFLX stock overview
- NFLX income statement
- NFLX valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.