StockData

Fortrea vs Guardant Health

FTRE and GH side by side, both in health services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How FTRE and GH compare

Guardant Health is the larger company, worth 11 times as much as Fortrea ($20.8B against $2.0B).

Guardant Health grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (41.7% versus −3.4% for Fortrea).

Fortrea keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −2.6% compared with −37.9% at Guardant Health.

Guardant Health scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 4 for Fortrea), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricFTREGH
Size and price
Market cap$2.0B$20.8B
Share price$20.38$154.78
Change, 1 year82.3%58.1%
Change, 5 years–58.6%
Beta (5Y)1.471.62
Employees14K2,506
StockData Score
Total score49 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score23 (better)
Performance score2 (better)1
Health score05 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.7× (better)16.2×
P/B3.7×–
EV/EBITDA30.6×–
P/FCF11.6×–
FCF yield8.6% (better)−1.1%
Fair value$16.16–
Margin of safety−26.1%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−3.4%41.7% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average–27.9%
Profitability
Gross margin20.0%65.2% (better)
Operating margin0.48% (better)−39.4%
Net margin−2.6% (better)−37.9%
FCF margin6.3% (better)−18.2%
Return on equity−12.3%–
Return on invested capital0.69%–
Financial health
Debt / equity1.98–
Net debt / EBITDA9.12–
Interest coverage–−96.6×
Current ratio0.973.60 (better)
Altman Z-score0.793.69 (better)
Piotroski F-score36 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–0.00%
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions104%99.8%
Held by insiders3.9%1.8%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$4.7M (better)−$173M
Short interest, % of float9.2%7.2%

Go deeper

Other comparisons

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.