Flotek Industries vs WD 40
FTK and WDFC side by side, both in chemicals and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FTK and WDFC compare
WD 40 is the larger company, worth 3.2 times as much as Flotek Industries ($3.0B against $936M).
On earnings, Flotek Industries is cheaper: it trades at 32.3× trailing earnings, against 36.3× for WD 40.
Flotek Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (59.3% versus 11.0% for WD 40).
WD 40 keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.0% compared with 8.8% at Flotek Industries.
WD 40 pays a dividend yielding 1.9%; Flotek Industries does not pay one.
WD 40 scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 11 for Flotek Industries), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FTK | WDFC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $936M | $3.0B |
| Share price | $25.83 | $220.46 |
| Change, 1 year | 67.5% | 10.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 419% | −4.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.19 | 0.52 |
| Employees | 158 | 522 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 | 19 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 32.3× (better) | 36.3× |
| P/S | 2.7× (better) | 4.3× |
| P/B | 6.5× (better) | 10.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 19.7× (better) | 24.9× |
| P/FCF | – | 30.3× |
| PEG | – | 4.55 |
| FCF yield | – | 3.3% |
| Fair value | $21.70 | $187.26 |
| Margin of safety | −19.0% | −17.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 59.3% (better) | 11.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 34.9% (better) | 7.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −3.1% (better) | −9.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −10.1% | −9.1% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 3.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 23.3% | 55.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | 13.2% | 15.8% (better) |
| Net margin | 8.8% | 12.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | 14.2% |
| Return on equity | 24.4% | 30.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 30.8% (better) | 28.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.32 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.13 |
| Interest coverage | 8.5× | 39.3× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.30 | 2.57 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.28 | 12.17 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.9% |
| Payout ratio | – | 65.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 16 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 7.5% |
| Buyback yield | −0.02% | 1.0% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | −0.02% | 2.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 34.7% | 87.8% |
| Held by insiders | 65.1% | 0.98% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$26.0M | −$12.3K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 33.9% | 3.6% |
Go deeper
- FTK stock overview
- FTK income statement
- FTK valuation and score
- WDFC stock overview
- WDFC income statement
- WDFC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.