StockData

Fathom vs Opendoor Technologies

FTHM and OPEN side by side, both in real estate. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How FTHM and OPEN compare

Opendoor Technologies is the larger company, worth 266 times as much as Fathom ($1.3B against $5.0M).

Fathom grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.3% versus −28.8% for Opendoor Technologies).

Fathom keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −6.3% compared with −49.1% at Opendoor Technologies.

Fathom scores higher on the StockData Score (4 against 1 for Opendoor Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricFTHMOPEN
Size and price
Market cap$5.0M$1.3B
Share price$0.146$1.36
Change, 1 year−88.7%−82.9%
Change, 5 years−99.4%−93.1%
Beta (5Y)1.792.97
Employees2811,042
StockData Score
Total score4 (better)1
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score00
Performance score00
Health score11
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.0× (better)0.4×
P/B0.2× (better)2.2×
FCF yield−272%−131% (better)
Fair value$2.30$1.20
Margin of safety93.7% (better)−14.0%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)4.3% (better)−28.8%
Revenue growth, 5Y average18.9% (better)11.1%
Profitability
Gross margin–7.5%
Operating margin−5.1% (better)−19.0%
Net margin−6.3% (better)−49.1%
FCF margin−3.3% (better)−51.8%
Return on equity−79.0% (better)−235%
Return on invested capital−47.4%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.34–
Interest coverage–−5.4×
Current ratio0.771.68 (better)
Altman Z-score2.07 (better)−1.03
Piotroski F-score44
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions13.0%58.9%
Held by insiders34.6%17.0%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$336K
Short interest, % of float2.5%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.