Fathom vs Marcus & Millichap
FTHM and MMI side by side, both in real estate. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FTHM and MMI compare
Marcus & Millichap is the larger company, worth 188 times as much as Fathom ($918M against $4.9M).
Marcus & Millichap grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.0% versus −9.8% for Fathom).
Marcus & Millichap keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.8% compared with −11.3% at Fathom.
Marcus & Millichap pays a dividend yielding 2.1%; Fathom does not pay one.
Marcus & Millichap scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 0 for Fathom), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FTHM | MMI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.9M | $918M |
| Share price | $0.143 | $24.25 |
| Change, 1 year | −90.4% | −21.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −99.4% | −48.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.78 | 0.98 |
| Employees | 281 | 854 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 0 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 62.2× |
| P/S | 0.0× (better) | 1.1× |
| P/B | 2.7× | 1.6× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 31.5× |
| P/FCF | – | 13.9× |
| FCF yield | −228% | 7.2% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $11.43 |
| Margin of safety | – | −112% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −9.8% | 10.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 18.9% (better) | 1.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | −9.4% | 1.3% (better) |
| Net margin | −11.3% | 1.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | −2.9% | 8.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | −190% | 2.6% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −124% | 1.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 4.61 (better) | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | – | 17.2× |
| Current ratio | 0.56 | 2.79 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.88 | 4.67 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.1% |
| Payout ratio | – | 135% |
| Buyback yield | – | 4.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 6.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 13.0% | 60.4% |
| Held by insiders | 34.6% | 38.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$48.5K |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.5% | 3.7% |
Go deeper
- FTHM stock overview
- FTHM income statement
- FTHM valuation and score
- MMI stock overview
- MMI income statement
- MMI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.