FRP vs Tejon Ranch
FRPH and TRC side by side, both in real estate. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FRPH and TRC compare
Tejon Ranch is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as FRP ($443M against $360M).
Tejon Ranch grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (25.4% versus 2.5% for FRP).
Tejon Ranch keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.6% compared with 0.22% at FRP.
Tejon Ranch scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 1 for FRP), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FRPH | TRC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $360M | $443M |
| Share price | $18.75 | $16.38 |
| Change, 1 year | −19.0% | 4.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −42.3% | −19.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.49 | 0.68 |
| Employees | 25 | 65 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 1 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 71.2× |
| P/S | 8.3× | 7.8× (better) |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 0.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.3× (better) | 70.8× |
| FCF yield | −11.5% | – |
| Fair value | $17.51 | $8.88 |
| Margin of safety | −7.1% (better) | −84.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.5% | 25.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.7% (better) | 5.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −98.2% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −100% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −22.9% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 32.9% |
| Operating margin | 11.6% (better) | −0.91% |
| Net margin | 0.22% | 10.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | −95.1% | – |
| Return on equity | 0.02% | 1.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 1.3% (better) | −0.08% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 1.8× | – |
| Current ratio | – | 2.92 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.78 | 2.19 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 47.9% | 78.5% |
| Held by insiders | 24.4% | 5.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $10.4M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.1% | 6.7% |
Go deeper
- FRPH stock overview
- FRPH income statement
- FRPH valuation and score
- TRC stock overview
- TRC income statement
- TRC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.