Frontline vs Scorpio Tankers
FRO and STNG side by side, both in water transportation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FRO and STNG compare
Frontline grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−8.8% versus −24.6% for Scorpio Tankers).
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FRO | STNG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $56.90 | $92.60 |
| Change, 1 year | 130% | 49.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 560% | 454% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.83 | 0.39 |
| Employees | 85 | 14 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 5 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −8.8% (better) | −24.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.0% (better) | 0.48% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −48.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −23.8% (better) | −46.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −4.0% | 33.3% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 30.4% | 37.9% (better) |
| Net margin | – | 36.7% |
| FCF margin | 34.0% (better) | −8.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 11.0% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.77 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.53 (better) | −0.37 |
| Interest coverage | 2.6× | 4.4× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.87 | 9.33 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | – | 24.0% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 29.1% | 73.0% |
| Held by insiders | 35.6% | 7.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$517M |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.3% | 4.1% |
Go deeper
- FRO stock overview
- FRO income statement
- FRO valuation and score
- STNG stock overview
- STNG income statement
- STNG valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.