Freedom vs Piper Sandler Companies
FRHC and PIPR side by side, both in security brokers, dealers, and flotation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FRHC and PIPR compare
Freedom is the larger company, worth 2.6 times as much as Piper Sandler Companies ($11.9B against $4.5B).
On earnings, Piper Sandler Companies is cheaper: it trades at 14.8× trailing earnings, against 73.9× for Freedom.
Piper Sandler Companies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (32.1% versus 15.3% for Freedom).
Piper Sandler Companies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.5% compared with 6.5% at Freedom.
Piper Sandler Companies pays a dividend yielding 3.1%; Freedom does not pay one.
Piper Sandler Companies scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 7 for Freedom), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FRHC | PIPR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $11.9B | $4.5B |
| Share price | $187.00 | $63.81 |
| Change, 1 year | 19.5% | −21.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 167% | 42.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.98 | 1.31 |
| Employees | 12K | 1,858 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 73.9× | 14.8× (better) |
| P/S | 5.0× | 2.1× (better) |
| P/B | 7.8× | 3.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 41.3× | – |
| PEG | – | 0.43 |
| FCF yield | −7.5% | – |
| Fair value | $55.75 | $71.95 |
| Margin of safety | −235% | 11.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 15.3% | 32.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 44.6% (better) | 8.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 95.1% (better) | 45.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 94.6% (better) | 46.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −0.39% | 42.2% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 95.8% | – |
| Net margin | 6.5% | 14.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | −37.2% | – |
| Return on equity | 11.2% | 23.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.01 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.87 | 4.91 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 3.1% |
| Payout ratio | – | 46.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 1 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 23.3% |
| Buyback yield | – | 2.8% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 5.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 3.5% | 87.4% |
| Held by insiders | 68.1% | 2.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$8.8M (better) | −$12.9M |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.1% | 4.0% |
Go deeper
- FRHC stock overview
- FRHC income statement
- FRHC valuation and score
- PIPR stock overview
- PIPR income statement
- PIPR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.