Freedom vs Miami International
FRHC and MIAX side by side, both in security brokers, dealers, and flotation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FRHC and MIAX compare
Freedom is the larger company, worth 3.6 times as much as Miami International ($11.9B against $3.3B).
On earnings, Miami International is cheaper: it trades at 38.7× trailing earnings, against 73.9× for Freedom.
Miami International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.8% versus 15.3% for Freedom).
Miami International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.7% compared with 6.5% at Freedom.
Miami International scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 7 for Freedom), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FRHC | MIAX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $11.9B | $3.3B |
| Share price | $187.00 | $33.63 |
| Change, 1 year | 19.5% | −22.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 167% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.98 | 0.94 |
| Employees | 12K | 439 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 73.9× | 38.7× (better) |
| P/S | 5.0× | 2.3× (better) |
| P/B | 7.8× | 2.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 41.3× | 17.9× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 13.3× |
| FCF yield | −7.5% | 7.5% (better) |
| Fair value | $55.75 | $21.53 |
| Margin of safety | −235% | −56.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 15.3% | 16.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 44.6% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 95.1% | 7832% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 94.6% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −0.39% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 95.8% (better) | 34.3% |
| Operating margin | – | 7.9% |
| Net margin | 6.5% | 9.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | −37.2% | 17.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 11.2% | 12.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 23.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −4.41 |
| Interest coverage | – | 31.9× |
| Current ratio | – | 2.61 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.87 | 5.75 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 1.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 1.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 3.5% | 72.6% |
| Held by insiders | 68.1% | 23.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$8.8M (better) | −$79.3M |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.1% | 11.6% |
Go deeper
- FRHC stock overview
- FRHC income statement
- FRHC valuation and score
- MIAX stock overview
- MIAX income statement
- MIAX valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.