Farmland Partners vs Transcontinental Realty Investors
FPI and TCI side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FPI and TCI compare
Transcontinental Realty Investors is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Farmland Partners ($438M against $368M).
Transcontinental Realty Investors grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.3% versus −5.6% for Farmland Partners).
Farmland Partners keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 19.5% compared with 16.1% at Transcontinental Realty Investors.
Farmland Partners pays a dividend yielding 3.9%; Transcontinental Realty Investors does not pay one.
Transcontinental Realty Investors scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 4 for Farmland Partners), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FPI | TCI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $368M | $438M |
| Share price | $8.43 | $49.93 |
| Change, 1 year | −16.5% | 16.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −32.0% | 29.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.56 | 0.17 |
| Employees | 12 | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 2 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 53.1× |
| P/S | 7.4× (better) | 8.7× |
| P/B | – | 0.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.4× (better) | 77.1× |
| Fair value | $6.00 | $31.98 |
| Margin of safety | −40.5% (better) | −56.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −5.6% | 5.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 0.58% (better) | −3.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −85.8% | 22.0% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 23.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 15.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | −18.3% |
| Net margin | 19.5% (better) | 16.1% |
| Return on equity | – | 0.96% |
| Return on invested capital | – | −0.96% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | – | −1.0× |
| Altman Z-score | 1.16 | 1.73 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.9% (better) | 0.00% |
| Payout ratio | 222% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 47.4% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 3.9% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 53.8% | 3.8% |
| Held by insiders | 7.9% | 85.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $89.6K | $7.8M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.7% | 3.5% |
Go deeper
- FPI stock overview
- FPI income statement
- FPI valuation and score
- TCI stock overview
- TCI income statement
- TCI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.