StockData

Farmland Partners vs Gladstone Land

FPI and LAND side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How FPI and LAND compare

Farmland Partners is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Gladstone Land ($368M against $320M).

Gladstone Land grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (21.6% versus −5.6% for Farmland Partners).

Farmland Partners keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 19.5% compared with −7.3% at Gladstone Land.

Both pay dividends: Farmland Partners yields 3.9% and Gladstone Land 7.6%.

Gladstone Land scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 4 for Farmland Partners), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricFPILAND
Size and price
Market cap$368M$320M
Share price$8.43$7.41
Change, 1 year−16.5%−18.7%
Change, 5 years−32.0%−71.1%
Beta (5Y)0.560.91
Employees1275
StockData Score
Total score48 (better)
Valuation score03 (better)
Growth score11
Performance score2 (better)1
Health score00
Dividend score13 (better)
Valuation
P/S7.4×3.6× (better)
P/B–0.5×
EV/EBITDA14.4×–
Fair value$6.00$9.63
Margin of safety−40.5%23.1% (better)
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−5.6%21.6% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average0.58%9.1% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)−85.8% (better)−183%
Profitability
Net margin19.5% (better)−7.3%
Return on equity–−0.96%
Financial health
Altman Z-score1.16 (better)0.44
Piotroski F-score55
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield3.9%7.6% (better)
Payout ratio222%–
Years of dividend growth4–
Dividend growth, 5Y average47.4%–
Shareholder yield3.9%7.6% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions53.8%40.5%
Held by insiders7.9%0.00%
Insider net buying, 12 months$89.6K–
Short interest, % of float9.7%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.