Five Point vs Maui Land & Pineapple
FPH and MLP side by side, both in real estate. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FPH and MLP compare
Five Point is the larger company, worth 2.2 times as much as Maui Land & Pineapple ($662M against $300M).
Maui Land & Pineapple grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−4.1% versus −39.1% for Five Point).
Five Point keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 24.9% compared with −28.6% at Maui Land & Pineapple.
Five Point scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 7 for Maui Land & Pineapple), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FPH | MLP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $662M | $300M |
| Share price | $4.47 | $15.11 |
| Change, 1 year | −25.7% | −0.53% |
| Change, 5 years | −30.7% | 46.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.88 | 0.69 |
| Employees | 90 | 20 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 5.6× (better) | 18.6× |
| P/B | – | 9.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.0× | – |
| P/FCF | 110× | – |
| FCF yield | 0.91% | – |
| Fair value | $8.47 | $8.98 |
| Margin of safety | 47.2% (better) | −68.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −39.1% | −4.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −6.5% | 20.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −68.8% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | −36.3% |
| Net margin | 24.9% (better) | −28.6% |
| FCF margin | 5.1% | – |
| Return on equity | – | −16.1% |
| Return on invested capital | – | −19.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | – | 1.17 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.62 | 7.54 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 25.3% | 23.7% |
| Held by insiders | 21.0% | 62.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$693K | $347K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.59% | 3.3% |
Go deeper
- FPH stock overview
- FPH income statement
- FPH valuation and score
- MLP stock overview
- MLP income statement
- MLP valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.