Five Point vs FRP
FPH and FRPH side by side, both in real estate. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FPH and FRPH compare
Five Point is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as FRP ($618M against $360M).
FRP grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2.5% versus −40.8% for Five Point).
Five Point keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 45.3% compared with 0.22% at FRP.
Five Point scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 1 for FRP), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FPH | FRPH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $618M | $360M |
| Share price | $4.18 | $18.75 |
| Change, 1 year | −28.3% | −19.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −43.3% | −42.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.88 | 0.49 |
| Employees | 90 | 25 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 5.3× (better) | 8.3× |
| P/B | – | 0.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 1.6× (better) | 15.3× |
| P/FCF | 9.5× | – |
| FCF yield | 10.5% (better) | −11.5% |
| Fair value | $11.57 | $17.51 |
| Margin of safety | 63.9% (better) | −7.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −40.8% | 2.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −6.5% | 12.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −31.9% (better) | −98.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −100% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −22.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 11.6% |
| Net margin | 45.3% (better) | 0.22% |
| FCF margin | 55.8% (better) | −95.1% |
| Return on equity | – | 0.02% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 1.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | – | 1.8× |
| Altman Z-score | 0.59 | 0.78 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 25.3% | 47.9% |
| Held by insiders | 21.0% | 24.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$693K | $10.4M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.47% | 4.1% |
Go deeper
- FPH stock overview
- FPH income statement
- FPH valuation and score
- FRPH stock overview
- FRPH income statement
- FRPH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.