Fox Factory vs Standard Motor Products
FOXF and SMP side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FOXF and SMP compare
Standard Motor Products is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as Fox Factory ($990M against $738M).
Standard Motor Products grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.5% versus −2.2% for Fox Factory).
Standard Motor Products keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.8% compared with −28.6% at Fox Factory.
Standard Motor Products pays a dividend yielding 2.9%; Fox Factory does not pay one.
Standard Motor Products scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 6 for Fox Factory), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FOXF | SMP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $738M | $990M |
| Share price | $17.57 | $44.31 |
| Change, 1 year | 9.8% | 16.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −90.5% | −15.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.27 | 0.73 |
| Employees | 3,700 | 5,700 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 14.5× |
| P/S | 0.5× (better) | 0.5× |
| P/B | – | 1.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 6.8× |
| P/FCF | 10.2× | 6.8× (better) |
| FCF yield | 9.9% | 14.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $26.18 | $52.31 |
| Margin of safety | 32.9% (better) | 15.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −2.2% | 5.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.5% (better) | 9.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 122% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 118% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −6.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 29.8% | 32.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | −26.7% | 8.5% (better) |
| Net margin | −28.6% | 3.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.1% | 7.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 9.9% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 10.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.67 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 1.88 |
| Interest coverage | −8.0× | 5.4× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.82 (better) | 1.81 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.46 | 2.39 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.9% |
| Payout ratio | – | 41.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 1 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 19.9% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.03% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 3.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 105% | 82.0% |
| Held by insiders | 1.8% | 8.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $0 (better) | −$1.6M |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.8% | 4.5% |
Go deeper
- FOXF stock overview
- FOXF income statement
- FOXF valuation and score
- SMP stock overview
- SMP income statement
- SMP valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.