Forrester Research vs Hackett
FORR and HCKT side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FORR and HCKT compare
Hackett is the larger company, worth 1.9 times as much as Forrester Research ($331M against $174M).
Forrester Research grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−7.7% versus −8.2% for Hackett).
Hackett keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.3% compared with −12.0% at Forrester Research.
Hackett pays a dividend yielding 3.6%; Forrester Research does not pay one.
Hackett scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 7 for Forrester Research), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FORR | HCKT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $174M | $331M |
| Share price | $9.13 | $13.32 |
| Change, 1 year | 14.8% | −28.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −84.3% | −38.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.95 | 0.88 |
| Employees | 1,474 | 1,503 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 18 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 19.0× |
| P/S | 0.5× (better) | 1.2× |
| P/B | 1.6× (better) | 4.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 12.2× |
| P/FCF | 39.9× | 15.9× (better) |
| FCF yield | 2.5% | 6.3% (better) |
| Fair value | $11.66 | $14.72 |
| Margin of safety | 21.7% (better) | 9.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −7.7% (better) | −8.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −2.4% | 5.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 63.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 84.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 22.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 56.9% (better) | 41.0% |
| Operating margin | −13.4% | 11.7% (better) |
| Net margin | −12.0% | 6.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 1.2% | 7.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | −33.6% | 20.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −37.0% | 14.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.27 (better) | 1.21 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 2.21 |
| Interest coverage | – | 8.1× |
| Current ratio | 1.02 | 2.13 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.12 | 4.01 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 3.6% |
| Payout ratio | – | 68.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 4.8% |
| Buyback yield | – | 15.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 18.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 60.5% | 84.5% |
| Held by insiders | 40.7% | 12.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$199K | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.6% | 5.6% |
Go deeper
- FORR stock overview
- FORR income statement
- FORR valuation and score
- HCKT stock overview
- HCKT income statement
- HCKT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.