Forestar vs Millrose Properties
FOR and MRP side by side, both in real estate. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FOR and MRP compare
Millrose Properties is the larger company, worth 3.7 times as much as Forestar ($4.3B against $1.2B).
On earnings, Forestar is cheaper: it trades at 6.9× trailing earnings, against 8.6× for Millrose Properties.
Millrose Properties keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 63.2% compared with 9.9% at Forestar.
Millrose Properties pays a dividend yielding 11.8%; Forestar does not pay one.
Forestar scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 10 for Millrose Properties), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FOR | MRP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.2B | $4.3B |
| Share price | $22.84 | $26.03 |
| Change, 1 year | −5.9% | −17.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 9.6% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.90 | 0.46 |
| Employees | 78 | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 3 | 3 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 6.9× (better) | 8.6× |
| P/S | 0.7× (better) | 5.5× |
| P/B | 0.6× (better) | 0.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.4× (better) | 6.3× |
| P/FCF | 4.1× | – |
| FCF yield | 24.3% | – |
| Fair value | $37.94 | $43.62 |
| Margin of safety | 39.8% | 40.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 11.8% | – |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.3% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 4.7% | 161% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 4.4% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 21.2% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 21.4% | – |
| Operating margin | – | 85.2% |
| Net margin | 9.9% | 63.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 16.4% | – |
| Return on equity | 9.6% (better) | 8.6% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 11.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 4.2× |
| Altman Z-score | 1.54 (better) | 0.84 |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 11.8% |
| Payout ratio | – | 99.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 11.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 36.8% | 85.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.33% | 14.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$232K | $6.8M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.0% | 7.5% |
Go deeper
- FOR stock overview
- FOR income statement
- FOR valuation and score
- MRP stock overview
- MRP income statement
- MRP valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.