StockData

Hang Feng Technology Innovation vs Roma Green Finance

FOFO and ROMA side by side, both in management and public relations services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How FOFO and ROMA compare

Hang Feng Technology Innovation grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (14.7% versus −22.2% for Roma Green Finance).

Roma Green Finance keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −288% compared with −412% at Hang Feng Technology Innovation.

Hang Feng Technology Innovation scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 5 for Roma Green Finance), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricFOFOROMA
Size and price
Share price$1.76$6.61
Change, 1 year−85.6%136%
Change, 5 years–−24.8%
Beta (5Y)−2.370.54
Employees1417
StockData Score
Total score6 (better)5
Valuation score00
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score00
Health score55
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)14.7% (better)−22.2%
Net income growth (TTM)−1206%–
EPS growth (TTM)−850%–
Profitability
Gross margin–17.1%
Operating margin−419%−315% (better)
Net margin−412%−288% (better)
FCF margin−55.4% (better)−209%
Return on equity−159%−44.2% (better)
Return on invested capital−523%−49.3% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00
Current ratio36.70 (better)22.34
Piotroski F-score4 (better)3
Ownership
Held by institutions1.1%–
Held by insiders52.8%10.2%
Short interest, % of float0.06%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.