StockData

Hang Feng Technology Innovation vs Lichen International

FOFO and LICN side by side, both in management and public relations services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How FOFO and LICN compare

Hang Feng Technology Innovation keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −412% compared with −2715% at Lichen International.

Hang Feng Technology Innovation scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 5 for Lichen International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricFOFOLICN
Size and price
Share price$1.76$0.040
Change, 1 year−85.6%−98.9%
Beta (5Y)−2.37–
Employees14399
StockData Score
Total score6 (better)5
Valuation score00
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score00
Health score55
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)14.7%–
Revenue growth, 5Y average–−51.7%
Net income growth (TTM)−1206%–
EPS growth (TTM)−850%–
Profitability
Gross margin–1129%
Operating margin−419% (better)−2234%
Net margin−412% (better)−2715%
FCF margin−55.4% (better)−2206%
Return on equity−159%−35.1% (better)
Return on invested capital−523%−34.4% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00
Current ratio36.70 (better)5.81
Piotroski F-score4 (better)3
Ownership
Held by institutions1.1%–
Held by insiders52.8%0.00%
Short interest, % of float0.06%0.62%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.