StockData

Hang Feng Technology Innovation vs Greenpro Capital

FOFO and GRNQ side by side, both in management and public relations services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How FOFO and GRNQ compare

Hang Feng Technology Innovation grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (14.7% versus 8.1% for Greenpro Capital).

Greenpro Capital keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −116% compared with −412% at Hang Feng Technology Innovation.

Greenpro Capital scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 6 for Hang Feng Technology Innovation), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricFOFOGRNQ
Size and price
Market cap–$13.5M
Share price$1.76$7.44
Change, 1 year−85.6%−59.3%
Change, 5 years–−91.8%
Beta (5Y)−2.370.09
Employees1441
StockData Score
Total score68 (better)
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score11
Performance score01 (better)
Health score55
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–4.4×
P/B–0.7×
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)14.7% (better)8.1%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–−1.7%
Net income growth (TTM)−1206%–
EPS growth (TTM)−850%–
Profitability
Gross margin–52.6%
Operating margin−419%−110% (better)
Net margin−412%−116% (better)
FCF margin−55.4%–
Return on equity−159%−29.3% (better)
Return on invested capital−523%−44.7% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00
Interest coverage–−4735.7×
Current ratio36.70 (better)15.92
Altman Z-score–7.16
Piotroski F-score4 (better)2
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions1.1%0.78%
Held by insiders52.8%–
Insider net buying, 12 months–$400K
Short interest, % of float0.06%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.