Franco Nevada vs Wheaton Precious Metals
FNV and WPM side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FNV and WPM compare
Wheaton Precious Metals grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (80.2% versus 63.7% for Franco Nevada).
Franco Nevada scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 7 for Wheaton Precious Metals), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FNV | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $224.95 | $116.58 |
| Change, 1 year | 20.6% | 22.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 57.3% | 184% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.51 | 0.74 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 63.7% | 80.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.3% | 16.1% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 101% | 178% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 27.5% (better) | 23.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 73.9% (better) | 72.2% |
| Operating margin | 74.3% (better) | 68.3% |
| FCF margin | 81.8% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 1.18 |
| Interest coverage | 437× (better) | 275× |
| Current ratio | 9.38 (better) | 0.47 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Years of dividend growth | 9 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 8.1% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 74.4% | 67.1% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.4% | 1.3% |
Go deeper
- FNV stock overview
- FNV income statement
- FNV valuation and score
- WPM stock overview
- WPM income statement
- WPM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.