Franco Nevada vs Royal Gold
FNV and RGLD side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FNV and RGLD compare
Royal Gold grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (93.5% versus 63.7% for Franco Nevada).
Royal Gold pays a dividend yielding 0.83%; Franco Nevada does not pay one.
Royal Gold scores higher on the StockData Score (21 against 9 for Franco Nevada), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FNV | RGLD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $19.4B |
| Share price | $224.95 | $228.77 |
| Change, 1 year | 20.6% | 29.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 57.3% | 118% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.51 | 0.63 |
| Employees | – | 39 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 21 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 25.0× |
| P/S | – | 12.5× |
| P/B | – | 2.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 15.7× |
| PEG | – | 1.88 |
| Fair value | – | $195.71 |
| Margin of safety | – | −16.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 63.7% | 93.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.3% | 19.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 64.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 101% (better) | 34.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 27.5% | 36.2% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 73.9% (better) | 66.8% |
| Operating margin | 74.3% (better) | 61.4% |
| Net margin | – | 47.7% |
| FCF margin | 81.8% | – |
| Return on equity | – | 13.5% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 14.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.05 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.17 |
| Interest coverage | 437× | – |
| Current ratio | 9.38 (better) | 2.92 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 7.18 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.83% |
| Payout ratio | – | 18.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | 9 | 15 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 8.1% | 11.7% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | – | 0.83% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 74.4% | 84.7% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 0.30% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$5.8M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.4% | 2.6% |
Go deeper
- FNV stock overview
- FNV income statement
- FNV valuation and score
- RGLD stock overview
- RGLD income statement
- RGLD valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.