Funko vs Mattel
FNKO and MAT side by side, both in dolls, toys, games and sporting and athletic. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FNKO and MAT compare
Mattel is the larger company, worth 11 times as much as Funko ($4.6B against $403M).
On earnings, Mattel is cheaper: it trades at 9.4× trailing earnings, against 103× for Funko.
Mattel grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.4% versus 1.2% for Funko).
Mattel keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.0% compared with 0.49% at Funko.
Mattel scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 7 for Funko), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FNKO | MAT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $403M | $4.6B |
| Share price | $7.19 | $16.08 |
| Change, 1 year | 92.2% | −16.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −59.1% | −29.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.94 | 0.95 |
| Employees | 1,104 | 31K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 103× | 9.4× (better) |
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 0.8× |
| P/B | 2.0× | 2.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.9× (better) | 9.0× |
| P/FCF | 8.3× | – |
| PEG | – | 2.31 |
| FCF yield | 12.1% | – |
| Fair value | $2.08 | $23.45 |
| Margin of safety | −245% | 31.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.2% | 6.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.8% (better) | 3.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 16.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 27.6% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 28.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 46.3% | 49.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 3.6% | 9.5% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.49% | 9.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.2% | – |
| Return on equity | 2.4% | 21.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 5.6% | 11.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.99 (better) | 1.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.64 (better) | 2.52 |
| Interest coverage | – | 4.2× |
| Current ratio | 1.19 | 1.98 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.81 | 2.81 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.00% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Buyback yield | – | 10.8% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 10.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 84.0% | 107% |
| Held by insiders | 11.6% | 18.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.4M | $422K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 16.6% | 12.0% |
Go deeper
- FNKO stock overview
- FNKO income statement
- FNKO valuation and score
- MAT stock overview
- MAT income statement
- MAT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.