Funko vs JAKKS Pacific
FNKO and JAKK side by side, both in dolls, toys, games and sporting and athletic. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FNKO and JAKK compare
Funko and JAKKS Pacific are about the same size, with market caps of $388M and $414M.
On earnings, JAKKS Pacific is cheaper: it trades at 16.8× trailing earnings, against 98.7× for Funko.
JAKKS Pacific grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.2% versus 1.2% for Funko).
JAKKS Pacific keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.2% compared with 0.49% at Funko.
JAKKS Pacific pays a dividend yielding 2.8%; Funko does not pay one.
JAKKS Pacific scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 6 for Funko), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FNKO | JAKK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $388M | $414M |
| Share price | $6.91 | $35.93 |
| Change, 1 year | 87.3% | 112% |
| Change, 5 years | −60.7% | 229% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.93 | 1.22 |
| Employees | 1,104 | 652 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 98.7× | 16.8× (better) |
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 0.7× |
| P/B | 2.0× | 1.5× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.8× (better) | 13.4× |
| P/FCF | 8.0× (better) | 11.6× |
| FCF yield | 12.5% (better) | 8.6% |
| Fair value | $3.37 | $24.50 |
| Margin of safety | −105% | −46.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.2% | 9.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.8% (better) | −26.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 330% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 304% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 46.3% (better) | 32.1% |
| Operating margin | 3.6% | 3.7% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.49% | 4.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.2% | 5.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | 2.4% | 9.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 5.6% | 8.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.99 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.64 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 94.5× |
| Current ratio | 1.19 | 1.67 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.79 | 2.60 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.8% |
| Payout ratio | – | 43.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 2.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 84.0% | 59.9% |
| Held by insiders | 11.6% | 21.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.4M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 16.6% | 3.6% |
Go deeper
- FNKO stock overview
- FNKO income statement
- FNKO valuation and score
- JAKK stock overview
- JAKK income statement
- JAKK valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.