Funko vs Hasbro
FNKO and HAS side by side, both in miscellaneous manufacturing industries. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FNKO and HAS compare
Hasbro is the larger company, worth 47 times as much as Funko ($16.8B against $357M).
Hasbro grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (27.6% versus −3.9% for Funko).
Hasbro keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 15.6% compared with −0.22% at Funko.
Hasbro pays a dividend yielding 2.4%; Funko does not pay one.
Hasbro scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 9 for Funko), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FNKO | HAS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $357M | $16.8B |
| Share price | $6.37 | $119.09 |
| Change, 1 year | 106% | 52.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −66.4% | 24.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.95 | 0.84 |
| Employees | 1,104 | 4,520 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 2 |
| Health score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 17.7× |
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 2.7× |
| P/B | 1.9× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.1× (better) | 13.3× |
| P/FCF | 13.1× (better) | 13.7× |
| FCF yield | 7.6% (better) | 7.3% |
| Fair value | $9.08 | $133.86 |
| Margin of safety | 29.8% (better) | 11.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −3.9% | 27.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.8% (better) | −0.37% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 44.9% | 78.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | 2.7% | 21.9% (better) |
| Net margin | −0.22% | 15.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 2.9% | 20.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | −1.1% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 4.2% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.07 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.89 | 1.82 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 7.8× |
| Current ratio | 1.16 | 1.40 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.70 | 4.10 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.4% |
| Payout ratio | – | 41.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 1 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 0.58% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 2.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 84.0% | 98.3% |
| Held by insiders | 11.6% | 0.64% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.4M (better) | −$50.2M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 15.4% | 5.9% |
Go deeper
- FNKO stock overview
- FNKO income statement
- FNKO valuation and score
- HAS stock overview
- HAS income statement
- HAS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.