Floor & Decor vs Home Depot
FND and HD side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FND and HD compare
Home Depot is the larger company, worth 65 times as much as Floor & Decor ($328B against $5.1B).
On earnings, Floor & Decor is cheaper: it trades at 22.1× trailing earnings, against 23.0× for Home Depot.
Home Depot grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2.5% versus 2.4% for Floor & Decor).
Home Depot keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.4% compared with 4.9% at Floor & Decor.
Home Depot pays a dividend yielding 2.8%; Floor & Decor does not pay one.
Home Depot scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 13 for Floor & Decor), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FND | HD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.1B | $328B |
| Share price | $47.59 | $329.20 |
| Change, 1 year | −31.1% | −12.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −64.3% | −10.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.53 | 0.90 |
| Employees | 14K | 472K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 22.1× (better) | 23.0× |
| P/S | 1.1× (better) | 1.9× |
| P/B | 2.0× (better) | 19.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.0× (better) | 15.5× |
| P/FCF | 24.0× | 21.8× (better) |
| FCF yield | 4.2% | 4.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $64.99 | $262.12 |
| Margin of safety | 26.8% (better) | −25.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.4% | 2.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 14.1% (better) | 4.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 9.9% (better) | −2.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 10.3% (better) | −2.9% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 0.85% | 3.6% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 44.9% (better) | 33.2% |
| Operating margin | 6.4% | 12.4% (better) |
| Net margin | 4.9% | 8.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | 4.5% | 8.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | 9.7% | 104% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 9.9% | 25.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.08 (better) | 3.18 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.23 | 2.07 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 8.7× |
| Current ratio | 1.33 (better) | 1.08 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.50 | 5.59 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.8% |
| Payout ratio | – | 64.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 16 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 8.9% |
| Buyback yield | – | −0.10% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 2.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 119% | 75.2% |
| Held by insiders | 1.2% | 0.07% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$13.7M | −$6.7M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 13.2% | 1.2% |
Go deeper
- FND stock overview
- FND income statement
- FND valuation and score
- HD stock overview
- HD income statement
- HD valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.