StockData

Kandal M Venture vs Vera Bradley

FMFC and VRA side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How FMFC and VRA compare

Kandal M Venture grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−0.34% versus −1.7% for Vera Bradley).

Vera Bradley scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 1 for Kandal M Venture), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricFMFCVRA
Size and price
Market cap–$218M
Share price$1.79$7.61
Change, 1 year−93.0%181%
Change, 5 years–−27.5%
Beta (5Y)1.281.10
Employees241,360
StockData Score
Total score19 (better)
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score01 (better)
Performance score01 (better)
Health score16 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–0.8×
P/B–1.6×
P/FCF–7.4×
FCF yield–13.4%
Fair value–$6.29
Margin of safety–−21.0%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−0.34% (better)−1.7%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–−10.5%
EPS growth (TTM)0.00%–
Profitability
Gross margin18.9%50.4% (better)
Operating margin1.9% (better)−3.6%
Net margin–−3.7%
FCF margin−11.2%10.7% (better)
Return on equity–−7.4%
Return on invested capital–−7.0%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Interest coverage2.4×–
Current ratio2.61 (better)2.44
Altman Z-score–3.61
Piotroski F-score–5
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions0.04%37.4%
Held by insiders0.00%39.5%
Insider net buying, 12 months–$959K
Short interest, % of float0.06%7.1%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.