Flexsteel Industries vs Purple Innovation
FLXS and PRPL side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FLXS and PRPL compare
Flexsteel Industries is the larger company, worth 44 times as much as Purple Innovation ($312M against $7.0M).
Flexsteel Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.4% versus −5.6% for Purple Innovation).
Flexsteel Industries keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.7% compared with −8.9% at Purple Innovation.
Flexsteel Industries pays a dividend yielding 1.2%; Purple Innovation does not pay one.
Flexsteel Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (22 against 2 for Purple Innovation), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FLXS | PRPL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $312M | $7.0M |
| Share price | $74.90 | $1.61 |
| Change, 1 year | 114% | −91.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 158% | −99.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.81 | 1.50 |
| Employees | 1,200 | 1,100 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 22 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.2× | – |
| P/S | 0.7× | 0.0× (better) |
| P/B | 2.4× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.6× | – |
| P/FCF | 7.4× | – |
| PEG | 0.40 | – |
| FCF yield | 13.6% (better) | −33.9% |
| Fair value | $88.15 | – |
| Margin of safety | 15.0% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.4% (better) | −5.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −0.84% (better) | −6.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 33.8% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 49.4% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 14.5% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 24.3% | 38.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | 8.7% (better) | −7.7% |
| Net margin | 6.7% (better) | −8.9% |
| FCF margin | 9.2% (better) | −0.55% |
| Return on equity | 20.5% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 23.4% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | −1.0× |
| Current ratio | 2.18 (better) | 0.47 |
| Altman Z-score | 5.84 (better) | −2.98 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.2% | – |
| Payout ratio | 14.0% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 13.6% | – |
| Buyback yield | −0.01% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.2% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 67.4% | 56.9% |
| Held by insiders | 14.0% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$3.0M | $29.4K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.9% | – |
Go deeper
- FLXS stock overview
- FLXS income statement
- FLXS valuation and score
- PRPL stock overview
- PRPL income statement
- PRPL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.